- —Security tickets land with no context on which workloads will break.
- —Trust-policy changes get rolled back at 3am because nobody simulated them.
- —Manual chase to find "who actually owns this role" before changing anything.
- —Hardening lives in a spreadsheet and slips quarter after quarter.
For platform engineering
Tighten machine identity without breaking production.
Identrail is built to be operated by the people who actually own the resource — with policy simulation, named blast radius, and rollout gates. So security can ask for the change, and platform can ship it safely.
Before vs. after Identrail.
- Every recommendation is pre-simulated against the last 30 days of activity.
- Workloads that would lose access are named, not counted.
- Ownership is auto-derived from tags, repos, namespaces — no chase.
- Dry-run, canary, enforce — three rollout gates with one-click rollback.
The three capabilities that matter for this audience.
See the diff and the impact before you ship.
Policy diff with annotated impact: which principals would lose which permissions, which workloads would be affected, by name. Scope the change down until the impact is exactly what you intend.
Three gates, one rollback button.
Dry-run records what *would* have happened. Canary applies to a scoped subset. Enforce ships everywhere. Every gate is reversible in one click and reverses cleanly.
The same trust graph, available to your team.
Findings route to the resource owner with the safe fix pre-staged. Operators see the same surface security sees — the conversation is "we both look at the same path", not "let me forward you a CSV".
Other audiences